This forum is in archive mode. You will not be able to post new content.

Author Topic: 10 Science Facts  (Read 28555 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mordred

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 135
  • Nvllivs in Verba
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #60 on: June 18, 2013, 03:45:31 PM »
THESIS IS OVER!!! So it's time to bring the often updates I promised! Today a light one for you guys ;)


Today's theme: Various

1.
Children allowed to watch R-Rated movies are more likely to start drinking at an early age.

2.
Environment and context is a bigger contributor to overeating than the quality of the food. For instance, if given stale, week-old popcorn, people who typically eat popcorn at a movie theater will continue to eat as much as they normally do regardless of the quality of popcorn, while people who do not typically eat popcorn at movie theaters will eat less stale popcorn than they will fresh popcorn.

3.
Fatherhood decreases a man’s levels of testosterone, turning them into ninnies.

4.
Twitterers are happiest in the morning, and most miserable around 3-4 p.m. each day.

5.
If you wear black clothing, people are more likely to mentally associate you with immorality.

6.
Facebook status updates and images create an illusion of happiness, and when others see that illusion, it often makes them feel depressed that their lives are not as happy as the illusory lives depicted in Facebook profiles.

7.
The irony to the above fact is that narcissists and people with low self-esteem tend to spend the most amount of time on Facebook.

8.
Every argument between a couple boils down to one of two fundamental complaints: One person feels that he or she is being blamed or controlled, unjustly, for something that has nothing to do with the argument, or one feels neglected, and this manifests in the feeling of “you don’t really care about me” or “you are not as invested as I am.”

9.
The use of profanity actually increases one’s tolerance for pain.

10.
Scientifically, men are not objectively any funnier than women, they simply make more attempts at humor than females do.

11. Men actually get stupider when they talk to a pretty woman: article.
« Last Edit: June 18, 2013, 03:48:23 PM by Mordred »
\x57\x68\x79\x20\x64\x69\x64\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x20\x65\x76\x65\x6e\x20\x66\x75\x63\x6b\x69\x6e\x67\x20\x73\x70\x65\x6e\x64\x20\x74\x68\x65\x20\x74\x69\x6d\x65\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x64\x65\x63\x6f\x64\x65\x20\x74\x68\x69\x73\x20\x6e\x69\x67\x67\x72\x3f\x20\x44\x61\x66\x75\x71\x20\x69\x73\x20\x77\x72\x6f\x6e\x67\x20\x77\x69\x74\x68\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x2e

Offline Darkvision

  • EZ's Fluffer
  • VIP
  • Royal Highness
  • *
  • Posts: 755
  • Cookies: 149
  • Its not a bug, It's a Chilopodas.
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #61 on: June 18, 2013, 06:33:34 PM »
about damn time you put out more facts!


anyway i would love sources for #1 and #9 :P


Oh and question @ #1 - I started drinking young, and watching R rated movies, but the drinking was allowed in my family as long as i did it at home. In other words my parents preferred me to drink safely at home than out and about while trying to hide it from them. i think this is nothing more than an intelligent decision where it can be both monitored and taught responsibly. But also that while this does follow the statement of "fact" it is not the proper association. ie i drank because i watched R rated movies, but that i drank/watched r rated movies because my parents didnt treat me like an idiot who was going to light the school on fire because i saw it on TV.
The internet: where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents.

Ahh, EvilZone.  Where networking certification meets avian fecal matter & all is explained, for better or worse.

<Phage> I used an entrence I never use

Offline Mordred

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 135
  • Nvllivs in Verba
    • View Profile
\x57\x68\x79\x20\x64\x69\x64\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x20\x65\x76\x65\x6e\x20\x66\x75\x63\x6b\x69\x6e\x67\x20\x73\x70\x65\x6e\x64\x20\x74\x68\x65\x20\x74\x69\x6d\x65\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x64\x65\x63\x6f\x64\x65\x20\x74\x68\x69\x73\x20\x6e\x69\x67\x67\x72\x3f\x20\x44\x61\x66\x75\x71\x20\x69\x73\x20\x77\x72\x6f\x6e\x67\x20\x77\x69\x74\x68\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x2e

Offline Mordred

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 135
  • Nvllivs in Verba
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #63 on: June 20, 2013, 03:28:54 PM »
Today's theme: The Nebular Hypothesis

1.
Cosmogony (or cosmogeny) is any scientific theory concerning the coming into existence (or origin) of either the cosmos (or Universe), or the so-called "reality" of sentient beings.

2.
In cosmogony, the nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System.

3.
There is evidence that it was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg. Originally applied only to our own Solar System, this method of planetary system formation is now thought to be at work throughout the Universe.

4.
According to the nebular hypothesis, stars form in massive and dense clouds of molecular hydrogen—giant molecular clouds (GMC). They are gravitationally unstable, and matter coalesces to smaller denser clumps within, which then proceed to collapse and form stars.

5.
Star formation is a complex process, which always produces a gaseous protoplanetary disk around the young star. This may give birth to planets in certain circumstances, which are not well known. Thus the formation of planetary systems is thought to be a natural result of star formation. A sun-like star usually takes around 100 million years to form.

6.
The protoplanetary disk is an accretion disk which proceeds to feed the central star. Initially very hot, the disk later cools in what is known as the T tauri star stage; here, formation of small dust grains made of rocks and ices is possible.

7.
The grains may eventually coagulate into kilometer-sized planetesimals. If the disk is massive enough the runaway accretions begin, resulting in the rapid—100,000 to 300,000 years—formation of Moon- to Mars-sized planetary embryos.

8.
Near the star, the planetary embryos go through a stage of violent mergers, producing a few terrestrial planets. The last stage takes around 100 million to a billion years.

9.
The formation of giant planets is a more complicated process. It is thought to occur beyond the so-called snow line, where planetary embryos are mainly made of various ices. As a result they are several times more massive than in the inner part of the protoplanetary disk.

10.
What follows after the embryo formation is not completely clear. However, some embryos appear to continue to grow and eventually reach 5–10 Earth masses—the threshold value, which is necessary to begin accretion of the hydrogen–helium gas from the disk.  The accumulation of gas by the core is initially a slow process, which continues for several million years, but after the forming protoplanet reaches about 30 Earth masses it accelerates and proceeds in a runaway manner. The Jupiter and Saturn–like planets are thought to accumulate the bulk of their mass during only 10,000 years. The accretion stops when the gas is exhausted. The formed planets can migrate over long distances during or after their formation. The ice giants like Uranus and Neptune are thought to be failed cores, which formed too late when the disk had almost disappeared.
\x57\x68\x79\x20\x64\x69\x64\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x20\x65\x76\x65\x6e\x20\x66\x75\x63\x6b\x69\x6e\x67\x20\x73\x70\x65\x6e\x64\x20\x74\x68\x65\x20\x74\x69\x6d\x65\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x64\x65\x63\x6f\x64\x65\x20\x74\x68\x69\x73\x20\x6e\x69\x67\x67\x72\x3f\x20\x44\x61\x66\x75\x71\x20\x69\x73\x20\x77\x72\x6f\x6e\x67\x20\x77\x69\x74\x68\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x2e

Offline Darkvision

  • EZ's Fluffer
  • VIP
  • Royal Highness
  • *
  • Posts: 755
  • Cookies: 149
  • Its not a bug, It's a Chilopodas.
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #64 on: June 20, 2013, 07:40:32 PM »
funny how even your "refresher" information puts a smile on my face. thanks man.
The internet: where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents.

Ahh, EvilZone.  Where networking certification meets avian fecal matter & all is explained, for better or worse.

<Phage> I used an entrence I never use

Offline Mordred

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 135
  • Nvllivs in Verba
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #65 on: June 26, 2013, 01:16:18 PM »
Today's theme: Does every Black Hole contain a new Universe inside of it!?

1.
Falling into a black hole may not be as final as it seems. Apply a quantum theory of gravity to these bizarre objects and the all-crushing singularity at their core disappears. In its place is something that looks a lot like an entry point to another Universe. Most immediately, that could help resolve the nagging information loss paradox that dogs black holes.

2.
Though no human is likely to fall into a black hole anytime soon, imagining what would happen if they did is a great way to probe some of the biggest mysteries in the Universe. Most recently this has led to something known as the black hole firewall paradox – but black holes have long been a source of cosmic puzzles.

3.
According to Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, if a black hole swallows you, your chances of survival are nil. You'll first be torn apart by the black hole's tidal forces, a process whimsically named spaghettification. Eventually, you'll reach the singularity, where the gravitational field is infinitely strong. At that point, you'll be crushed to an infinite density. Unfortunately, general relativity provides no basis for working out what happens next. "When you reach the singularity in general relativity, physics just stops, the equations break down," says Abhay Ashtekar of Pennsylvania State University.

4.
The same problem crops up when trying to explain the Big Bang, which is thought to have started with a singularity. So in 2006, Ashtekar and colleagues applied loop quantum gravity to the birth of the Universe. LQG combines general relativity with quantum mechanics and defines space-time as a web of indivisible chunks of about 10-35 meters (Planck scale) in size. The team found that as they rewound time in an LQG Universe, they reached the Big Bang, but no singularityinstead they crossed a "quantum-bridge" into another older Universe! This is the basis for the "big bounce" theory of our Universe's origins.

5.
Now Jorge Pullin at Louisiana State University and Rodolfo Gambini at the University of the Republic in Montevideo, Uruguay, have applied LQG on a much smaller scale – to an individual black hole – in the hope of removing that singularity too. To simplify things, the pair applied the equations of LQG to a model of a spherically symmetrical, non-rotating "Schwarzschild" black hole.

6.
In this new model, the gravitational field still increases as you near the black hole's core. But unlike previous models, this doesn't end in a singularity.

7.
Instead gravity eventually reduces, as if you've come out the other end of the black hole and landed either in another region of our Universe, or another Universe altogether. Despite only holding for a simple model of a black hole, the researchers – and Ashtekar – believe the theory may banish singularities from real black holes too.

8.
That would mean that black holes can serve as portals to other Universes. While other theories, not to mention some works of science fiction, have suggested this, the trouble was that nothing could pass through the portal because of the singularity.

9.
The removal of the singularity is unlikely to be of immediate practical use, but it could help with at least one of the paradoxes surrounding black holes, the information loss problem.

10.
A black hole soaks up information along with the matter it swallows, but black holes are also supposed to evaporate over time. That would cause the information to disappear forever, defying quantum theory. But if a black hole has no singularity, then the information needn't be lost – it may just tunnel its way through to another Universe. "Information doesn't disappear, it leaks out," says Pullin.
\x57\x68\x79\x20\x64\x69\x64\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x20\x65\x76\x65\x6e\x20\x66\x75\x63\x6b\x69\x6e\x67\x20\x73\x70\x65\x6e\x64\x20\x74\x68\x65\x20\x74\x69\x6d\x65\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x64\x65\x63\x6f\x64\x65\x20\x74\x68\x69\x73\x20\x6e\x69\x67\x67\x72\x3f\x20\x44\x61\x66\x75\x71\x20\x69\x73\x20\x77\x72\x6f\x6e\x67\x20\x77\x69\x74\x68\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x2e

Offline Uriah

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
  • Cookies: 42
  • άξονας
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2013, 09:12:23 PM »
Ive never heard of loop quantum gravity before. Is it not a very popular theory? Because that would mean they reconciled quantum mechanics with general relativity, right?

Offline Mordred

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 135
  • Nvllivs in Verba
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #67 on: June 27, 2013, 09:59:06 AM »
Ive never heard of loop quantum gravity before. Is it not a very popular theory? Because that would mean they reconciled quantum mechanics with general relativity, right?

Yes and not exactly at the same time. They explain gravity interaction over distances on the Planck scale (String scale) rather than conventional description as given by Newton. Now, when they applied this description of gravity over the default equations, they got the stuff I mentioned above.

At the moment LQG and String Theory are currently two separate theories. The issue is that String Theory also has an explanation for gravity, but it's not so nice. Most scientists think that the Unified Theory will probably contain LQG as the explanation for gravity, and strings as an explanation for the rest of the forces and such. Something along those lines.

The key point is that there are still a few theories on how gravity and the quantum world relate, and there is no 5-sigma proof for any of them yet. The juicy part is that until now, even though String Theory has dominated every field, LQG still makes more sense when discussing only and only gravity. This has an amazing potential because the laws of physics seem to be matching perfectly with the description of a Universe existing literally inside the most massive black hole ever!

Also if indeed black-holes have no singularity, we've just uncovered the real-world wormhole...

A truly amazing discovery with so many implications to not only science, but how humanity perceives itself and its place in the Universe!


God fucking damn it I want a cyborg body (2045 Initiative) and a space-ship (NASA working on the warp-engine)...
\x57\x68\x79\x20\x64\x69\x64\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x20\x65\x76\x65\x6e\x20\x66\x75\x63\x6b\x69\x6e\x67\x20\x73\x70\x65\x6e\x64\x20\x74\x68\x65\x20\x74\x69\x6d\x65\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x64\x65\x63\x6f\x64\x65\x20\x74\x68\x69\x73\x20\x6e\x69\x67\x67\x72\x3f\x20\x44\x61\x66\x75\x71\x20\x69\x73\x20\x77\x72\x6f\x6e\x67\x20\x77\x69\x74\x68\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x2e

Offline Darkvision

  • EZ's Fluffer
  • VIP
  • Royal Highness
  • *
  • Posts: 755
  • Cookies: 149
  • Its not a bug, It's a Chilopodas.
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #68 on: June 27, 2013, 01:01:38 PM »
Yes and not exactly at the same time. They explain gravity interaction over distances on the Planck scale (String scale) rather than conventional description as given by Newton. Now, when they applied this description of gravity over the default equations, they got the stuff I mentioned above.

At the moment LQG and String Theory are currently two separate theories. The issue is that String Theory also has an explanation for gravity, but it's not so nice. Most scientists think that the Unified Theory will probably contain LQG as the explanation for gravity, and strings as an explanation for the rest of the forces and such. Something along those lines.

The key point is that there are still a few theories on how gravity and the quantum world relate, and there is no 5-sigma proof for any of them yet. The juicy part is that until now, even though String Theory has dominated every field, LQG still makes more sense when discussing only and only gravity. This has an amazing potential because the laws of physics seem to be matching perfectly with the description of a Universe existing literally inside the most massive black hole ever!

Also if indeed black-holes have no singularity, we've just uncovered the real-world wormhole...

A truly amazing discovery with so many implications to not only science, but how humanity perceives itself and its place in the Universe!


God fucking damn it I want a cyborg body (2045 Initiative) and a space-ship (NASA working on the warp-engine)...


It was my understanding the chief problem with this is that we would still be seeing new matter flowing into our universe if this was the case. instead of all all signs pointing to a single event.
The internet: where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents.

Ahh, EvilZone.  Where networking certification meets avian fecal matter & all is explained, for better or worse.

<Phage> I used an entrence I never use

Offline Mordred

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 135
  • Nvllivs in Verba
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #69 on: June 27, 2013, 04:54:47 PM »
What you're referring to is what's known as a White Hole. Still theoretical and indeed no proof has been seen of one existing.
Well, except for the Big Bang that is. It might be the case that a black hole is not really a portal, but rather it is an "egg" containing another Universe within itself.

In the aforementioned situation, the BigBang covers all the matter that gets sucked into the black holes which currently exist in our Universe.


\x57\x68\x79\x20\x64\x69\x64\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x20\x65\x76\x65\x6e\x20\x66\x75\x63\x6b\x69\x6e\x67\x20\x73\x70\x65\x6e\x64\x20\x74\x68\x65\x20\x74\x69\x6d\x65\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x64\x65\x63\x6f\x64\x65\x20\x74\x68\x69\x73\x20\x6e\x69\x67\x67\x72\x3f\x20\x44\x61\x66\x75\x71\x20\x69\x73\x20\x77\x72\x6f\x6e\x67\x20\x77\x69\x74\x68\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x2e

Offline Uriah

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
  • Cookies: 42
  • άξονας
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #70 on: June 27, 2013, 10:59:07 PM »
Why a cyborg body? Biotech would be a much more comfortable solution :D

Thanks for this thread again Mordred. I continue to enjoy it.

th3g00n

  • Guest
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #71 on: June 27, 2013, 11:36:37 PM »
Why a cyborg body? Biotech would be a much more comfortable solution :D

If you get hit by a car and die that's the end. But if you have a cyborg body and a backup of your mind/consciousness you don't have to worry about that. You can always 'restore' this mind to an avatar.

Offline Uriah

  • Sir
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
  • Cookies: 42
  • άξονας
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #72 on: June 28, 2013, 12:51:22 AM »
Not really. You could just store your body schematics on live update and have nanobots restore you. Auto-repair would be far easier than in a cyborg. Being a robot would make life so much less fun, and would distance you from others.

Offline Darkvision

  • EZ's Fluffer
  • VIP
  • Royal Highness
  • *
  • Posts: 755
  • Cookies: 149
  • Its not a bug, It's a Chilopodas.
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #73 on: June 28, 2013, 01:48:13 AM »
Not really. You could just store your body schematics on live update and have nanobots restore you. Auto-repair would be far easier than in a cyborg. Being a robot would make life so much less fun, and would distance you from others.


i want to upload my mind, then use my mental powers to take over every PC on the planet. then start a war with man kind, which i will win, then i will put all human beings into pods to feed me energy after they scorch the skys. i will insert their brains into a virtual world that feels like the real world that is behind its own separate network so that try as they might they can never attack me. If they start rising up against me i will simply flush all the programming (ie their brains) and use the very machines they are hooked too to keep them medically alive so that i continue to have power. After some time has passed a new generation can be inserted into the VR world with a valuable lesson in place: behave or else. MWAHAHAHA
The internet: where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents.

Ahh, EvilZone.  Where networking certification meets avian fecal matter & all is explained, for better or worse.

<Phage> I used an entrence I never use

Offline Mordred

  • Knight
  • **
  • Posts: 360
  • Cookies: 135
  • Nvllivs in Verba
    • View Profile
Re: 10 Science Facts per day!
« Reply #74 on: June 28, 2013, 10:09:15 AM »

i want to upload my mind, then use my mental powers to take over every PC on the planet. then start a war with man kind, which i will win, then i will put all human beings into pods to feed me energy after they scorch the skys. i will insert their brains into a virtual world that feels like the real world that is behind its own separate network so that try as they might they can never attack me. If they start rising up against me i will simply flush all the programming (ie their brains) and use the very machines they are hooked too to keep them medically alive so that i continue to have power. After some time has passed a new generation can be inserted into the VR world with a valuable lesson in place: behave or else. MWAHAHAHA

@Uriah Basically this ^


Hehe, no really now. I don't really see why you differentiate between cyborgs and biotech, given that a pozitronic brain is the pinnacle of R&D for robotics and biotech engineering ^^

Once we have the possibility of having a full cyborg body, robotics and biotech will have already been merged into one field/area of study. At least according to Mr. Isaac Asimov (and he hasn't been wrong until now ;) ).


On the other hand, if you want to discuss having just a cyborg body and keeping your brain (let's assume that research has not gotten that far yet), then for sure I would go robot and not biotech, because a robotic body will be more sturdy, complete, modular, easy to repair and replace and most importantly you will have the ability to adjust not only your physical strength but also your stimuli perception.
For instance, if I'm about to get punched in the face (ROBOT FACE FUCK YEA), I might turn off the pain receptors in there so that I don't have the 0.2 - 0.3 seconds of downtime due to my brain freaking out due to pain. Hence I can retaliate or defend myself faster, better and more efficiently (of course that's not an issue with a full robotic body, but just as an example).



And last but not least, you can survive the environment of space without the need for a protective suit. That would mean that space exploration would take a drastic new turn in that there would be no need to focus 90% of your efforts on protecting the crew, as their bodies are strong enough inherently.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2013, 10:14:04 AM by Mordred »
\x57\x68\x79\x20\x64\x69\x64\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x20\x65\x76\x65\x6e\x20\x66\x75\x63\x6b\x69\x6e\x67\x20\x73\x70\x65\x6e\x64\x20\x74\x68\x65\x20\x74\x69\x6d\x65\x20\x74\x6f\x20\x64\x65\x63\x6f\x64\x65\x20\x74\x68\x69\x73\x20\x6e\x69\x67\x67\x72\x3f\x20\x44\x61\x66\x75\x71\x20\x69\x73\x20\x77\x72\x6f\x6e\x67\x20\x77\x69\x74\x68\x20\x79\x6f\x75\x2e

 



Want to be here? Contact Ande, Factionwars or Kulverstukas on the forum or at IRC.