before writing something to someone could you please think about it !!!! if you read all my replies in the forum you would see that i was thankful for many time , look for example what I wrote to namespace7

"your tutorial is very powerful and instructive i like it and thank you very much..." I would be thankful whenever I feel that the author deserve to be thanked , I will respect someone whenever I feel that he deserves respect , I will thank someone when he lets a strong impression in me , if he does not let an impression in me and instead he gives me an information without any base and value I will never be thankful
 when someone give an information for people to enlight them , he should give them a useful information not something complicated and confusing without header and footer
and it is my right and everyone's right to criticize the information and the source of information .

I am a beginner , someone ignorant how you want me to contribute , how you expect from a female calf to give milk ?!! how do you expect from a seed to generate fruits?? contribution is a process of time and the one who does not possess the thing cannot give it  this is logical and this is evident by  itself

the next time when you give a link , give something useful not nonsense

first I find no clue for this word " Memoryze" and the author peter does not explain it but he made it more confused and more complicated when he wrote " Memoryze is designed to aid in memory analysis in incident responsive scenarios" I did not see something more horrible , disgusting and unworthy than this sentence , it comes only from someone linguistically handicapped .

second whenever I press " Memoryze" it says we are sorry page does not exist and the same for the link of Memorize ..
so the next time give the hell something useful

perspicacious reply as it involves a challenge , your reply is a challenge to me  , , it means that it is up to me to settle the doubt to certainty

“Our doubts are traitors and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt”

hello
 
can you tell me if this decompiler is able to provide the exact program code as it is written and what are the software that it is unable to decompile them
what are the advantages and disadvantages of this decompiler??

namespace7

your tutorial is very powerful and instructive i like it and thank you very much

after reading your tutorial i can sum it up in 3 ideas

1) decompiling does not give the exact program code
2) as a consequence of one the resulting source code will be very complicated and hard to deal with and it will take a lot of time and cost a lot of energy especially for thousands of lines to understand and grasp
3)some programs are immunized against decompiling

so disassembling is the best way to work with a program
this is good

in a computer network there is no such a word called "respect", never trust anyone because i do not know this one in real life , i am in virtual so all possible and regardless the fact that he is VIP and his intentions .. everyone makes  mistakes because howsoever someone is skilled , he is always imperfect...from another part if the boomerang file is not infected , can you tell me why the anti-virus said that it is infected? why the test is false-positive??? and how to tell if the antivirus is wrong how to know that a file is really infected or not ? and most importantly could you please tell me how to find a virus without using an antivirus????can you answer my questions , i am interested in learning throughout your answers