EvilZone

Community => General discussion => Topic started by: Axon on January 26, 2012, 03:32:46 PM

Title: Forensic vs Security
Post by: Axon on January 26, 2012, 03:32:46 PM
I have question .

What is the difference between Forensic and security? Are they the same. Is there a solid definition to differentiate between them.

The reason why am asking this is because I've seen in many forums and sites people regarding some of the famous security tools as forensic tools (e.g Wireshark). Can we consider forensic a branch of security or vise versa


Title: Re: Forensic vs Security
Post by: petermlm on January 26, 2012, 03:36:44 PM
I think forensic is a branch of security, yes.
Title: Re: Forensic vs Security
Post by: Stackprotector on January 26, 2012, 03:38:39 PM
in most cases forensics is the process after there has been an compromise or searching for specific data who can lead to evidence of a case.

The president got security,  so he will not get shot by some random guy,   when he gets shot, a forensics team will find out how this could happen and who did it and then passing it back to the security world so they can take measurements so it will not happen again.

Tools like wireshark can be used to do research on for example .pcap file who are files who contain very detailed network logs (the packets), and you can extract everything from them, when you capture data with wireshark it will be saved to the same file type for later research.
Title: Re: Forensic vs Security
Post by: gh0st on January 26, 2012, 04:10:44 PM
security is priori of an attack event and forensic comes after so its posteriori
Title: Re: Forensic vs Security
Post by: Axon on January 26, 2012, 09:35:27 PM
Thank you all for the explanation. Security the immune system and forensic is the antibiotic  :P