EvilZone
Other => Found it on the Webs => Topic started by: gh0st on August 07, 2011, 08:21:17 PM
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP9q61Fjlqo&list=FLICZU_khavlk&index=5 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP9q61Fjlqo&list=FLICZU_khavlk&index=5)
-
yeah ok... video is not bad, but hey - media holds DDoS'ing as "hacking"...
-
You will rarely see me speak nice of Anonymous. But this was a very well crafted video. It only pulls forth the "good" things about Anonymous, but hey. I dont blame them, you do not advertice for your weak sides.
Anonymous weakness is Anonymous's strong side. There is no centralized control center. Which means anyone can say they are Anonymous, anyone can take the face of Anonymous. Which in terms means that: When some dick(s) represent Anonymous, the whole scene looks like dicks.
However, the idea. The concept. Is good!
Oh, and
@Kulverstukas
Good anon's dosent call DDoS hacking. The media is uneducated. Thats all.
-
I like the video.. But it's still anon.
-
nice vid all i can say,
media holds DDoS'ing as "hacking"...
and its not even a DDos attack just a Dos attack as far as I has seen
-
nice vid all i can say,
and its not even a DDos attack just a Dos attack as far as I has seen
DoS==denial of service, DDoS== distributed denial of service, in other words, more than 1 computer executing a dos attack.
-
DoS==denial of service, DDoS== distributed denial of service, in other words, more than 1 computer executing a dos attack.
There is the difference yes. But is a denial of service attack even effective agains any server that is more then an 80's server, XD!
Anyway. I don't have a formed opinion about Anonymous, anyone can easily say that he/she is Anonymous and any attack or other form of activism gets attributed to this word wide entity.
-
There is the difference yes. But is a denial of service attack even effective agains any server that is more then an 80's server, XD!
Anyway. I don't have a formed opinion about Anonymous, anyone can easily say that he/she is Anonymous and any attack or other form of activism gets attributed to this word wide entity.
depends on the hardware and the Internet speed of the server, when you got more upload than the server got download you are likely to shut down the bandwidth of the server, but these days almost all commercial sites run on dedicated servers, hosted professionally who you can't kill dossing at your home computer.
-
(...) but these days almost all commercial sites run on dedicated servers, hosted professionally who you can't kill dossing at your home computer.
Hum. What I thought.
-
depends on the hardware and the Internet speed of the server, when you got more upload than the server got download you are likely to shut down the bandwidth of the server, but these days almost all commercial sites run on dedicated servers, hosted professionally who you can't kill dossing at your home computer.
Don't forget the vulnerabilities that can cause a DoS attack and you don't need a fast connection or a fast computer to do it.
LINK to example :D (http://www.exploit-db.com/search/?action=search&filter_page=1&filter_description=&filter_exploit_text=&filter_author=&filter_platform=0&filter_type=1&filter_lang_id=0&filter_port=&filter_osvdb=&filter_cve=)
-
Don't forget the vulnerabilities that can cause a DoS attack and you don't need a fast connection or a fast computer to do it.
LINK to example :D (http://www.exploit-db.com/search/?action=search&filter_page=1&filter_description=&filter_exploit_text=&filter_author=&filter_platform=0&filter_type=1&filter_lang_id=0&filter_port=&filter_osvdb=&filter_cve=)
yhea i know but im talking about the flood variant :P